Weekly updates on the US elections Published on 2024-09-22
Teamsters Union Breaks Tradition, Declines Endorsement in 2024 Race
On September 18, 2024, the Teamsters union made a bold decision to withhold its endorsement in the presidential race, breaking from its long tradition of supporting Democratic candidates. This is significant because the union's membership has shown surprising support for Donald Trump, with internal surveys revealing nearly 60% favoring the former president despite his anti-union rhetoric. The decision could sway outcomes in key battleground states, where union support is often pivotal. The neutrality is a blow to Kamala Harris, whose campaign has counted on strong union backing to maintain momentum in the 2024 race, and could reflect wider cracks in traditional labor alliances.
House to Vote on Expanding Secret Service Protections After Trump Assassination Attempts
The House is gearing up for a crucial vote on Friday to extend Secret Service protection to major presidential and vice-presidential candidates, a move prompted by two assassination attempts on former President Donald Trump. The bipartisan bill, spearheaded by Reps. Mike Lawler (R) and Ritchie Torres (D), comes after security concerns following incidents at a Pennsylvania rally and Trump’s West Palm Beach golf property. The legislation requires a two-thirds majority for passage, highlighting the urgency of candidate protection. Meanwhile, a task force investigating security breaches has broadened its scope to include these attempts, and lawmakers continue to scramble for a stopgap funding bill to prevent a government shutdown by the September 30 deadline.
Democrats Go All In: $25 Million Push to Defend Senate Majority in Key 2024 Battlegrounds
With the battle for Senate control heating up ahead of the 2024 elections, Democrats are making a bold $25 million push to defend their razor-thin majority. The funds will fuel aggressive voter outreach in 10 key states, including battlegrounds like Arizona and Florida, where Democrats are fighting to unseat GOP incumbents. Targeting younger and nonwhite voters through digital and grassroots campaigns, the strategy is backed by a fundraising surge fueled by Kamala Harris’ presidential bid. As Republicans outspend their rivals, Democrats are betting big on turning out voters in critical races that could decide the balance of power in Washington.
The Impact of Job Growth and Inflation on Presidential Elections
Job growth and inflation are two key economic indicators that can significantly sway the outcome of presidential elections. When the economy is adding jobs, it generally boosts the incumbent’s chances, as voters associate rising employment with effective leadership. Strong job growth means more people are working, incomes are rising, and overall economic confidence improves, leading to a sense of stability. Historical examples, like Bill Clinton’s 1996 reelection during a period of economic expansion and low unemployment, show how a thriving job market can bolster political fortunes. Voters feel that continuity is the best option when the economy seems to be on the right track.
However, inflation can quickly unravel those gains by undermining purchasing power and increasing living costs. When inflation is high, voters feel the squeeze in their daily expenses, and that often leads to dissatisfaction with the current administration. It creates a sense of economic insecurity, even in periods of low unemployment, as wage growth may not keep up with rising costs. The 1980 presidential election is a prime example, where Jimmy Carter lost to Ronald Reagan amid high inflation, despite other economic indicators showing recovery. Inflation often has a more immediate impact on voters’ lives than job growth, making it a critical factor in presidential campaigns.
Ultimately, the interplay between job growth and inflation creates a delicate balancing act for presidential candidates. A strong economy with both job growth and manageable inflation provides the ideal conditions for incumbents seeking reelection. However, if inflation spikes or job growth stalls, it opens the door for challengers to argue for change, as voters tend to prioritize their financial security at the ballot box. Balancing these factors is essential, and as history shows, when one factor outweighs the other—such as high inflation during periods of otherwise strong job growth—the election outcome can shift dramatically in favor of the opposition.
